of us who have been subjected to the criminal abrogations of Constitutionally
defined human and civil rights of the divorce racketeering industry do
tend to ramble on about it whenever and wherever related topics arise.
These are some of my thoughts on the topic.
at 7:01pm PST I publicly observed that
Mention of "marriage" in a business context is becoming an indicator of
criminal orientation. The trend started with a "car dealer" who spewed
it forth in a totally off the wall context. Turned out the dealer doesn't
*sell* cars but only engages in felony identity theft. Most recently
talking with a bunko about a money market account, it was mentioned as
a "way around" the $250K limit (thru 2013) on FDIC insurance. Bunko has
NO financial statements (as in zilch, nada, zip, nothing) published for
review of whether it would even be rational to keep a hundred bucks there.
Stands to reason with the fraudulent, deceptive, and manipulative Constitutionally
abrogative (Articles XIV, XIII, V, and I) criminal scam of "marriage" that
it could be such an indicator.
For this blog, I add that I am aware that things were different prior to
the lesbian activist Eleanor Roosevelt who had her lesbian lover move into
the Witty Houze while she was usurping the powers of the Presidency from
her ailing "husband" FDR. Up until her social revisionism, facilitated
by "Rosie the Riveter's" harrassments and molestations of fellow female
workers during World War II, the "divorce rate" had never been as high
as 20%. Immediately after the male population returned from the fields
of battle and ever since, the ripemoff and throwemaway practices of the
divorce racketeering industry have been running around 57% of all such
criminal scams, not counting the males murdered (whether in foreign wars,
sometimes created for that specific purpose as with LBJ's VietNam killing
fields, or overtly by the lesbian oriented "wife") who died while still
"married" without benefit of divorce court abrogations.
The lunacy of the criminal abrogators and wanna be abrogators of Article
XIII of the US Constitution Amendments (prohibits ownership of any human
being by any other) never ceases to amaze. Today's news reports from
Nashville TN demonstrate yet another example. For those not already
familiar with the criminal religiosity of Tennessee, it has been the source
of numerous attacks against Article I's assertion of the human right to
freedom of speech under the pretense that the mere existence of speech
"somewhere" that residents of that blighted state conceivably might be
able to reach on the Internet constitutes an invasion of the criminally
abrogative religionist violations of Article I prevalent there.
The news reports the murder on July 4 of Steve McNair, an apparently locally
well known participant in the "steal the other guys' balls and do violence
to persons" faggot dominance ritual styled as "football". While already
known to be "owned" by another female in that criminally abrogative state,
a 20-year-old waitress decided that she wanted to steal the other female's
"property". So she began an affair with McNair and claimed that he
was in the midst of a "divorce" from his previous owner although no records
of any such potential change of unlawful ownership surfaced during investigation
of the murder. It was a rather ludicrous claim in the first place,
given the universally disastrous financial consequences of the criminal
scam "divorce" established by the perpetrators of unlawful ownership claims
for unwinding their previous violations of civil and human rights.
What appears to have precipitated the murder (and suicide by the murderess)
was the mere suspicion that McNair might also be "cheating" with somebody
else besides the wanna be new owner. The whole "cheating" concept
is ludicrous in light of Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments
which has prohibited all such ownership claims, the original owner's as
well as the wanna be owner's, ever since the 1860s. But it appears
that the prospect of competition for the property she wanted to own, in
criminal abrogation of the human and civil rights of the "property", was
enough to throw the looney girlfriend into
murderous attack against her "wanna become owner of" property. The
underlying problem remains the felonious criminal tax evaders of the religion
establishment, and their complicit criminally corrupt goofermintal officials,
who promote such claims of unlawful ownership of human beings in violation
of Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments.
"Promise Keepers" is a faggot religionist gang formed more than a decade
ago by the then ruling thug of the criminal assault department at the Loonie
Verse Itty of unCoolorado in the Bowels thereof. For male membership
only, its premise is that whenever one of their lesbian colleagues claims
ownership of a male citizen in violation of Article XIII of the US Constitution
Amendments, it is the duty of the slave to belong to that lesbian thug
in all regards even to the extent of never expressing any interest in any
other female person. Entirely consistent for a faggot gang to have
such a premise since they view it as a fundamental deviation from their
underlying homosexist orientation to have even so much as one female person
in the life of a male citizen.
Today's news reports have the junior snitter from my home state admitting
to having had an "affair" with a campaign worker and pushing that failure
to conform to faggot criminal religionist norms as being the "worst thing"
that he has ever done. Ignores the flagrant criminal abrogations
of the US Constitution he has facilitated, especially Article IV which
prohibits the illegal searches and seizures which he and his criminal cronies
in Worsingdone have been inflicting on Americans along with the hiring
of ten thousand additional violent criminal thugs to attack *Americans*
crossing the US borders on business or personal touring. Ignores
the flagrant criminal abrogation of Article XIII he is espousing with his
"Promise Keepers" membership and expressions of viewpoint from high public
office where he continues to perjure his oath of office to *uphold* rather
than abrogate the Constitution. Ignores the flagrant criminal abrogation
of the right to live of all life forms on earth which he and his senior
snitter have been promoting in Worsingdone via the construction of the
religionist Doomsday Machine 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas with seven
million bombs worth of high grade thermonuclear explosives intended to
arm it so that it can shatter the entire earth and destroy all life simultaneously
for the greater honor and gory of their belligerent blasphemy (all the
while pretending to Nevadans to be "opposing" that criminal religionist
atrocity). But since his entire "political" career has been based
on homosexist criminal abrogation and violation of the US Constitution,
nothing surprising in his latest nonsense promotions of the criminal "Promise
Keepers" abrogators and violators of the human and civil rights of hetero
oriented male citizens.
One thing we know for certain if John Ensign is ultimately replaced by
an appointee of the criminal religionist goofernor whose perjured membership
in the Hows of Unrepresentatives there included radical advocacy of transferring
tax money to criminal tax evading religionist preachers of torture and
murder of human beings especially males along with promoting raping and
pillaging of Nevada by freeloading frauds in the "mining" industry.
That is that the appointee won't be me nor any other hetero oriented American
male citizen nor anyone who actually would uphold the Constitution.
5:07pm Got lost in the byzantine complexities of the IRS rulez and
regurgitationz this year because of a new item I've never had before.
Under-claimed deductions by itemizing instead of taking the standard deduction.
IRS *partly* corrected my silly error. After checking out why their
figures were different from mine, I telephoned them. "What was your
filing status?" Single absolutely. "If you had had a wife,
she would have caught the error" ;(. Ye gads! Only thing a
wiffey would have done was to set up for criminal theft in the divorce
racketeering industry of everything not already stolen by the goofermint.
Preparing Form 1040X to claim the still larger amount to which I was entitled.
"NO SUCH PERSON" remains my answer to the "spouse" fraud that criminal
religionists have installed into the subverted tax code to assure that
their obedient slaves are treated far better than us mere *single* humans
(until the divorce gets filed).
The most ludicrous irrationality in the divorce racketeering swindle system
is the insistence that there is no right of contract for specific human
services nor freedom of association permissible between hetero persons.
The homosexist religionist abrogators insist that is a crime they call
"prostitution". Meanwhile flagrantly criminal abrogations of the
inalienable right NOT to be owned by any other person, established by Article
XIII of the US Constitution Amendments, is what they demand. Not
only demand but enforce via criminal thug magistrates and slave pursuit
"laws" using violence and threats of violence in the abrogations.
The frauds, coercions, and duress invariably inflicted during creation
of their "marriages" and "residential pottyner" and "palimony" swindles
are the only "rights" that the criminal abrogators recognize. They
pretend that the real and inalienable right NOT to be owned can be signed
away or vacated by their fraudulent clerks and religionist priesthood and
in Californicatia by mere persistence of criminal trespass of lesbian thieves.
Glancing around the Twitter web site today where
I tweet occasionally
I ran across the tweetings of the professed current Attorney General of
the State of Californicatia. Very focused on his apparent "re-election"
campaign in 2010, he twittered at length about how he at first felt it
necessary to defend the recent Proposition 8 (prohibits lesbians or faggots
claiming ownership of each other in the religion fraud of "marriage") but
then went on to say he had found another clause of the Constitution of
the State of Californicatia which he wildly misinterpreted so as to pretend
the criminal tax evading religion fraudocracy's slave mongering as being
a "right" of every resident of the state. That state has been notorious
for many many years for its criminal abuses of human beings on behalf of
the torture and murder "religion", extending the fraud and theft aspects
of "alimony" for criminal thieves all the way out to "palimony" for lesbian
criminal trespassers on the homes of male citizens devoid of any of the
requisite pretenses of consent and agreement normally required for the
interpretation that the lesbian criminal thief involved had any ownership
rights whatsoever. The notoriety was increased when their wooden
head puppet play actor goofernor Ronny Raygun was elevated to the Presiduncy
of the Loonie Tied Studs of Merka and not instantly but ultimately imposed
object rape con dumbs on the former places of worship of hetero religion
in the only state which theretofore had been in compliance with Article
I of the US Constitution's requirement that no goofermint could ever be
permitted to interfere with the otherwise lawful religion practices of
religons *other than* the torture and murder perversions that Ronny Raygun
and the criminal controllers of Californicatia insist must be inflicted
on everyone. Considering that there was not only medifraud terrorism
including falsification of incidence records involved but also subversion
of the tax laws to imprison the head of the largest place of worship of
hetero religion and subversion of the drug laws of the nation to send felonious
illegal drug pushers into the county where that place of worship had been
to poison the surrounding population and facilitate the desecration of
that place of worship, it was clearly not in any lawful interest that the
fascist criminal subverter of the human and civil rights of hetero Americans,
Ronny Raygun of Wholly Wierd Californicatia, carried out that criminal
scheme against American heteros at the insistence of his supportive national
faggot criminal gangs who voted to "make AIDS everybody's problem" while
in fact being exempted from the terrorist attacks generated by the Harlem
witch doctor who carried out the medifraud "authenticity" exercise on their
criminal behalf. Nor can there be any doubt that the slave ownership
features of the criminal scam euphemized as "marriage" have been for more
than 140 years and remain prohibited by Article XIII of the US Constitution
Amendments which outlawed all ownership of any human being by any other.
But with the successors of the violently enslaving Conquistadors retaining
virtually absolute control of that subverted goofermint in Californicatia,
to the extent that even in the face of fiscal catastrophe they refuse to
collect any of the taxes due from those criminal "religion" gangs on their
ludicrously large extorted incomes and stolen property holdings, it is
no surprise to see their puppet Attorney General absolutely disregarding
Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments so as to support malicious
lesbians and faggots in their criminal claims of "right" to own other human
at 11:20pm An avid promoter of the frequent antecedent of divorce
racketeering saw my standard legal notice rejecting the criminal atrocity
of "marriage" and wrote to me "Marriage is not for you? There is a story
Looooong story commencing with statutory rape of a minor boy for purposes
of inducing mirage, followed by inducing the purchase of an inflation adjusted
four million dollars of "life insurance" on the not then yet 18 year old
male, followed by an attempted vehicular homicide by another boyfriend
of the statutory rapist which did substantial permanent bodily injury,
followed by the inevitable divorce racketeering for fun and profit. Proceeding
right along in the homosexually regimented criminal state Loonie Verse
Itty town where the foregoing occurred, along comes "Lucretia Borgia" to
poison the remains that Divorce Racketeer Die Erste left, complete with
invasion of my home by her criminal cronies, invasion of the office where
I was employed by the wannabe competitor in business who was already trashing
my home, said "Lucretia" being Divorce Racketeer Numero Dos whose date
of terminal criminal abrogation of my civil rights under Articles XIV,
XIII, V, and I of the US Constitution Amendments is mentioned [in my standard
legal notice] as the terminus of my willingness to be involved in the criminal
conspiracy of the homosexual "churches" against the human and civil rights
of American males for the benefit of such as the intended "beneficiary"
of death insurance and the poisoner of life and business which they refer
to as "marriage".
I shouldn't omit from this lengthy story the attempted murder of me by
the dentifraud in Reno, prescribing a known cause of "patient death" as
if it were an antibiotic while his lesbian criminal clerks were intent
on writing in the name of one of their criminal cronies as posthumous "spouse"
under Nevada's "community property" laws to the point of objecting, devoid
of any conceivable standing, to my practice of writing "no such person"
on the otherwise fraudulently completable blank line by which invasive
abusive dentifrauds and others insist on obtaining information and/or opportunity
for frauds about "spouses". Cemeteries in Nevada are replete with samples
of tombstones on which locals were sufficiently doubtful of the criminal
claims for purposes of theft of estates as to be annotated "erected by
his wife" while being unable to *prove* to the contrary or to establish
Short form of all of the above is that this involves no lack of information
below and beyond the obvious 57% criminal theft via divorce racketeering
rate which is recorded in the general stats (not counting males murdered
while still "married", in foreign wars among other forms of murder including
what was attempted by Divorce Racketeer Die Erste, who aren't included
in the divorce statistics).
Incidentally, yes, I read where you are an avid proponent of the religious
institution about which you asked. No conflict for me in responding to
your humorous views on the inherent difficulties of the financial world
:). But on my own page I do require that my legal notice appear as a first
line of defense against what I see as inevitably and in all but a very
small minority of situations intentionally criminal theft system run by
homosexual thugs of the religion establishment in violation of the human
and civil rights of American hetero males.
Amusing sidelight on all this is the day I went in, just after moving to
Cursing City NV, to the Senior Citizen Center where the clerk informed
me that, my own views to the contrary notwithstanding, she and her lesbian
criminal cronies were going to get me "married" yet again. In light of
the known and previously experienced mechanism of poisoning to induce absurd
behaviors in the victims thereof and the standard practice of serving and
consuming food at the meetings in the Senior Citizen Center, I never returned
there. The persons therein were obviously too immature as human beings
and too accomplished as criminal thieves in the divorce racketeering industry
to provide any social relevance for an adult human male of considerable
human and financial experience.
Meanwhile, I hear that lesbians and faggots in the state of Californicatia
are eagerly pursuing the opportunities to claim ownership in violation
of Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments of others of their own
kind, despite the efforts of their homosexual criminal tax evading "church"
leaders to protect them from the predations against humanity of that institution
that they designed to destroy the lives of the vast majority of heteros
who ever get involved in it. Bizarre world some days.
at 2:23am I try to avoid reading the tabloids at the grocery store
but one caught my eye anyway today. Headline was to the effect that Obama
required Hillary Rodham to divorce Bill Clinton as a condition of her prospective
appointment as Secretary of State. That's gotta be one of the longest running
"divorce" scams on record, ongoing at least since the election campaign
of 1992, roughly five times as long as the typical lesbian criminal thief
divorce racketeer allows one of those fraudulent mirages created by the
criminal tax evading "churches" to exist at all. Can't say whether it'll
happen this time either, but omigosh "yawn".
at 7:45am I'm sure most of you have heard the endless horror
stories styled as "mother in law jokes". We all know that house guests
and dead fish start to stink after three days, if not sooner. Got a new
slant on the "in law jokes" last couple of days. As if couples themselves,
compounded further by a whole passel of children, didn't have enough problems!!!
Inlaw moved in on them for FOUR MONTHS (quite a bit longer than three days)
and then was offended when the unrelated, other than as a result of the
mirage, member of the couple started getting aggravated by the inlaw's
going on perpetual presence. Yikes!!!
at 10:04am Heard today the second stupidest reason for getting
involved with the lesbian criminal thieves of the divorce racketeering
industry. Today's second stupidest reason was from a young man whose cohabitant
was finagling him into the divorce racketeering scam: "because she deserves
it". Top honors for stupidity remains with the official of one of the criminal
gang "churches" in Northern Ireland. You know, the ones who violently maimed
their memberships for real or imagined lack of conformance with criminal
gang rule during the civil war in Northern Ireland. His Facebook status
line promotion, reported to me by a real world friend, was "I'm lonely,
so I should get a wife" (not even sure his criminal gang "church" allows
marriage of its homosexist officials, but that's the notion he was promoting).
Certainly does further that church's preachings of torture and murder of
male citizens, hence within his official duties.
at 4:38am An Australian citizen, being enslaved by the criminal
tax evading homosexual "religion" gangs in his country, asked me some years
ago whether he might find any respite from the criminal thefts of his property
and income on behalf of the lesbian thug that the "courts" there, controlled
by Her Majesty the Queen of England who appoints their Supreme Court, had
declared to be his owner. Regretfully, I had to inform him that no, Articles
XIV, XIII, V, and I of the US Constitution Amendments had been so subverted
by those same medieval European criminal thugs that the divorce racketeering
situation here in the United States was every bit as bad as what he was
experiencing in "Church" controlled Australia.
at 6:11am I don't suppose freeloaders are sensitive enough
to see the difference. There are those of us who have been subjected to
fraudulent mirage, nearly successful attempted murder for insurance, years
of body destroying slavery, multiple poisonings by persons with access
to our homes, flying fists following from lesbian "consciousness raising"
sessions, and even attempted murder under color of "health services" license
for the purpose of appointing a posthumous "spouse". We are unlikely prospects
for panhandlers demanding donations for "homeless women and children" after
decades of being put through homelessness ourselves and body crippling
slavery by the criminal thefts of the divorce racketeering industry. But
I suppose they really don't care. Nor do the criminal thugs appointed by
slave mongering "religionists" destroying the lives of male citizens in
that industry in violation of the US Constitution. Met such a freeloader
when I went shopping in LA County this afternoon. Beau Ring
at 2:39am Those of us who have had our lives and fortunes destroyed
by the homosexual criminals of the divorce racketeering industry do not
tolerate criminal assertions of "ownership" of one's self in violation
of Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments. A former Facebook
"friend" attempted such a criminal assertion earlier today using one of
the crime promoting Facebook "applications" which treat such criminal abrogations
as if it were a "game". He has been removed from my "friends" list.
Friends do not OWN each other nor endeavor to claim such (the way that
divorce racketeers invariably do). Addendum 081114: that
criminally abusive "friend" on Facebook was an identified member of the
group of felons who stole my photograph from my Profile page there and
created a series of felony identity theft FB accounts using my photograph
and variations of my name to promote homosexist causes and for other criminal
acts against me.
at 7:20pm Happy 33rd Anniversary to me of FREEDOM DAY, when
I was declared to be no longer the Article XIII violated property of lesbian
divorce racketeer Numero Dos. Horribly expensive for me because the homosexual
Xian criminal thug magistrate involved didn't like the laws of the state
which required him to be less unfair to me. But FREEDOM DAY established
on this date immediately between Lincoln's Birthday and Valentine's Day
:). I've managed to steer clear of subsequent lesbian criminal wannabe
slave owners ever since, even the ones who tried to have me murdered in
Reno by their faggot dentifraud malprescriber of lethal chemicals so as
to get one of themselves declared to be a posthumous "wife".
at 6:05pm The homosexual subversion of civil and human rights
they call "marriage" is so foul that they'll even kill you to inflict it
on your murdered corpse. Couple of years ago I visited one of the
effluents of the homosexually regimented Loonie Verse Itty of Nevada at
Reno. He prescribed what he called an "antibiotic" which proved to be a
faggot designer drug for causing chemical sodomization and "patient death".
His lesbian clerks were quite abusive about my having filled in the "spouse"
question on their invasive "medical information" form with "NO SUCH PERSON".
Seemed they intended to do what so many other criminals in that state have
done to others: to create a tombstone in a cemetery with my name on it,
my corpse underneath, and the "erected by his wife" monicker as part of
stealing my property under the draconian "community property" laws.
at 11:05am The worst of it is what is done to people in California
where the criminal theft of "palimony" and recognition of "residential
partners" creates situations as destructive of individual human rights
as the mirage swindle itself, but the fraud of "common law" mirage, i.e.
the criminal thugs of the curt system pretending there was one of their
slave mongering frauds even when the male victim never intended for there
to be, is inflicted elsewhere too.
Talking with other males about entirely different subjects, they frequently
launch into impromptu unrelated detailing of the criminal thefts of their
homes, their incomes, and their lives which have been inflicted by the
criminal thugs of the curt system in violation of the US Constitution whose
Article XIII prohibits the kind of *ownership* claims that those curts
are acting on in rewarding lesbian frauds with such violently enforced
largesse. It is a shameful subversion of human and civil rights.
at 6:59am One of the lesbian divorce racketeers tromping around
on Facebook wrote on a group posting area "any christians out there up
right now?", i.e. anybody who believes in the torture and murder of male
citizens via whatever means including criminal theft of life, liberty,
property and pursuit of happiness in violation of Articles XIV, XIII, V,
and I of the US Constitution Amendments via the inevitable conclusion of
the Mirage Swindle System promoted by the homosexual Xian "churches" to
the extent of 57% of all males ever entering into that criminal fraud system
(not counting those murdered by their "wives" while still "married").
Archbishop O'Malley expressed himself well, after settling for mere money
the criminal realities of his faggot priesthood molesting and raping young
boys, to urge his leagues of licensed professional liars to help protect
fellow lesbians and faggots from that system of frauds designed explicitly
to crucify heteros.
my response to a story published this date about Virginia legis critters
"apologizing" for the racial version of slavery:
Anyone who has been through the lesbian criminal divorce racketeering industry
knows that slavery continues to flourish in the United States to this very
day. In Las Vegas, one of their criminally corrupt judges even threw
a man in jail for being *unable* to pay the criminally approved slave payments
to a lesbian criminal slave owner who had already been "divorced" from
the former and continuing slave. It is kind of cute how the wannabe
lesbian slave owners typically wear "white" and require their slaves to
be to wear "black" when performing their homosexual church approved takings
of ownership. When the Missouri Supreme Court struck down an "alienation
of affection" award to a previous slave owner, it was only for the benefit
of the subsequent slave owner who had "stolen" the male slave. Nothing
whatever for the victim of the crime of slavery carried on by the churches,
the "marriage" fraud with its 57% divorce rate (not counting those males
murdered while "married), and the divorce racketeering criminally corrupt
judiciary which enforces the payments by slaves to their current/ former
The bottom line is that the pretense of the fraudulent legis critters in
the state most closely affiliated with Worsingdone
of Corruption of "apologizing" for one version of slavery, while continuing
to carry on the most flagrant and abusive ongoing form of slavery, is patently
"I'm her eigth old man, I'm enna ree, Henry the Eighth I am" were the words
of a popular song in the 1960s. Those lyrics express the reality
of the lesbian divorce racketeering system built on the guilt feelings
of successors to the judges who approved the murders of the series of wives
of the criminal thug Henry VIII of England, each of which wives perpetrated
the "treason" of failing to litter the landscape with progeny to rule that
blighted thugocratic torturous and murderous cesspool which was and is
To assuage that guilt the frauds and thieves of the homosexual Xian divorce
rackets destroy the lives and fortunes of millions of male citizens claimed
to be owned, in violation of Article XIII of the US Constitution Amendments,
by female criminal thugs every bit as vile and destructive as the nominally
male British king Henry VIII. The violators of the Constitution have
gone so far as to imprison a man in Las Vegas Nevada for failing
fact being unable) to pay what his former illegal owner got that criminally
corrupt court to approve.
Yet the man in that city of felony identity thieves, Lost Wages, was comparatively
lucky. One of his peers in the lesbian run divorce rackets in the
bowels of unCoolorado made an effort to comply with the criminally abusive
and flagrantly unconstitutional order of the magistrate there. Robbed
a store to get the money, caught and imprisoned for years. The magistrate
and lesbians involved laughed aloud in open court about that compliance
with an illegal court order while the magistrate imposed ongoing liability
for a fraudulent scam the mother/daughter lesbian team had run on him while
he had been slaving for them.
Particularly revealing of the homosexual criminal Xian nature of the atrocities
of the divorce racketeering busyness was the exhortation delivered to Roman
Catholic lawyers by new Archbishop O'Malley of Boston which was reported
January 11, 2004. Those lawyers had been kept busy for many years
subverting the laws against molestation and rape of children, protecting
the faggot criminals among officials of "the church" there from prosecution,
by pretending their faggot criminal thug officials were *above* the laws
of Massachusetts and the United States.
An $85 million strictly financial settlement, devoid of any of the jail
time due to be imposed on those faggot criminal child molesters and
rapists, had freed those lawyers to pursue O'Malley's demand that lesbians
and faggots be protected from the criminal abrogations of human and civil
rights which the church's "marriage" institution inflicts on heteros.
Similar violations of the Equal Protection of the Laws clause of the US
Constitution had been written into law elsewhere, so as to define the Constitution
abrogating fraud of Xian "marriage" as being a viciousness reserved exclusively
for use against heteros.
With so many of his church officials and membership being devoted to homosexuality
and to inflicting homosexual abuse on others including children, it is
easy to understand why O'Malley was so concerned that lesbians and faggots
be protected against each other's criminal theft motives long since demonstrated
in their divorce racketeering abuses of hetero humanity. The massive
increases in divorce rates had created an environment in which the homosexist
predators had nobody remaining to turn their criminal attentions to than
It would be as simple for them as acknowledging the reality that Article
XIII of the US Constitution Amendments prohibits ownership of any human
person by any other, but for their greedy and avaricious stake in the divorce
racketeering busyness, rental of church facilities for the imposition of
that criminal slave ownership system on male citizens, and profound "religious"
hatred of heterosexuals in general and males in particular.
The sudden concern about protecting homosexuals from each other's criminal
theft motives arose out of a November 2003 ruling by the Massachusetts
Supreme Judicial Court that same-sex couples have a "right" to carry on
the same slave owning and divorce racketeering theft practices currently
reserved by the church and its related criminal tax evading Xian imitators
for lesbian criminal thieves seeking ownership of male citizens.
His Eminence has his work cut out for him trying to protect his lesbian
and faggot parishioners and church officials from each other in the criminally
abrogative fraud system they of the church have always maliciously inflicted
on heteros. "We do this kind of criminal thing only to heteros" doesn't
hold together very well logically despite other tax evading homosexual
criminal Xian gangs elsewhere passing state Constitutional Amendments setting
forth exactly that "as a matter of law" (but in violation of the Equal
one of the favorite sayings of the licensed professional liars who run
the divorce racketeering industry is that the thefts in those criminally
corrupt courts are "the screwing you're getting for the screwing you got".
As if the intentionally incompetent and often malicious sexual malbehaviors
of "wife"s were in any way comparable to the efforts of competent courtesans
or any but the least competent 10% of decent working girls ;(
In violation of the Constitution of the United States, the homosexual Xian
churches have set up a slave mongering subversion of the court system to
destroy the lives and steal the property of male citizens of hetero orientation,
still in operation more than "seven score years" after such ownership claims
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime,
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
slavery (noun) 1. the owning or keeping of slaves as a
practice or institution; slaveholding. 2. the condition of being
a slave; bondage; servitude. 3. a condition of submission to or domination
by some influence, habit, etc.
slave (noun) 1. a human being who is owned as property
by another and is absolutely subject to his will; bondservant divested
of all freedom and personal rights. 2. a person who is completely
dominated by some influence, habit, person, etc.
outdated idea that married people have property interests in each other"
- Judge Richard Teitelman writing for the majority of the Missouri
Supreme Court in a 5:2 decision published 030617 striking down an arcane
legal doctrine based on the presumption of such ownership rights.
Year Marriages Divorces
Numbers in Thousands, Rate as Percent
The Hammond Almanac, 1980, page 251
Table 3. Provisional number of marriages and divorces:
Each division and State January 1998-2000
[By State of occurrence. Divorces include reported annulments]
**** Marriages ****
**** Divorces ****
East North Central 14028
9954 9916 11279
West North Central 7767
26527 26035 26741
16437 18031 15442
East South Central 19295
West South Central 17402 18094
20108 22806 18820
18985 12552 12100
145859 128253 133253
77762 74948 70176
summary 1998 was 52.7%, in 1999 was 58.4%, in 2000 was 53.3%
of this table was the
CDC web site
the date is that of the computer file that I retained of the content of
my response to an investments newsgroup post relating to the banking industry
in Australia, not necessarily when I wrote it. What I said was:
Quite regardless of what you or the belligerent blasphemers that you go
to listen to every Sunday have to say, the fact of the matter from the
viewpoint of a lender is that the criminally abusive divisions of assets
and liabilities which occur in the lesbian supremacist divorce racketeering
industry are not an acceptable financial risk. Hence there is no
excuse for leaving interpretation of individual liability for the debt,
of the likely beneficiary of lesbian supremacist "morality", up to some
probable Kangaroo Court magistrate.
We have six million males on the streets of the United States these days,
made homeless as a result of the criminal perversions of the Kangaroo Courts
and of the similarly lesbian supremacist approach of sending males *only*
off to "fight their country's battles" in lesbian arranged murder sprees
of the males of various countries. That is more than two percent
of the *entire* population of the United States made destitute as a result
of criminal religious practices. Oddly enough, it is nearly a third
of the total population of Australia albeit in a much more heavily populated
land mass. Even that number is ignoring the thousands of males murdered
in the mines and other slave labor camps created by Xian perverts in such
Alabama who were incarcerated for purely *religious* crimes such as "adultery"
or "non support" of some lesbian thief awarded slave ownership in violation
of Article XIII of the U.S. Constitution.
Then the very belligerent blasphemers who created the problems in the first
place come around on holidays blasphemously asking for "donations" to feed
the homeless they created, such feedings to occur on those holidays only.
Pshaw! The lender is right to demand individual liability of the
prospective freeloading divorce racketeer. Now *if* in fact it is
true that many or most lenders in Australia are ignoring these cold hard
truths of the divorce racketeering industry, then that would be an additional
reason to place an "avoid" on the shares of such irresponsible lenders.
am not now, nor have I been at any time since February 13,
nor shall I ever again voluntarily be married to any
whomsoever in any place wheresoever. I am not
for any debts other than my own.
Robert E. Grumbine, MBA